_____________________
Like Pamela Anderson switching the setting from Calm People Up to Calm People Down in the 2025 Naked Gun that I enjoyed so much:
Cue Enya...
Who can say where the road goes?
Only time.
____________
I. I've been in crisis mode, here in Minneapolis under the ICE surge. Most everyone around me has been in emergency mode.
Naturally.
And there's this unspoken assumption that this emergency will go away, . . . and then we'll return to normal.
I don't think so.
I mean, yes, ICE will go away from this city, one day, and that will be a good day.
But they'll go somewhere else (they already are).
And, more importantly for the long term:
they are not a force acting in isolation, as we can easily see.
They are a symptom, a manifestation, not the root cause.
Even if they evaporated, their origins would remain.
This the way we live now.
We are like the snowboarders in the Big Air competition I watched on this weekend’s Olympics, flying off a steep ramp into empty space.
Let's learn to grab air!
Twist and turn and fly... It takes calm, to stay centered while you're flying. AND LAND.
Normal is different now. And changing as we speak.
Artificial Intelligence.
II. First, this weekend I filed a claim to receive money from
the Anthropic AI copyright-infringement lawsuit settlement,
which...
I don't even know how to phrase it!
From NPR:
Anthropic will compensate authors around $3,000 for each of the estimated 500,000 books.How weird it is that three books I wrote are included in that settlement?
Anthropic AI used the contents of millions of digitized copyrighted books to train the large language models behind their chatbot, Claude.
--npr.org/2025/09/05/nx-s1-5529404/anthropic-settlement-authors-copyright-ai
VERY WEIRD.
I won't get 3k per book.
Half goes to the publisher (who commissioned me to write these nonfiction books for high school readers). And there are fees, I gather. Taxes?
I don't know.
Let's say I'll get a total of $3,000?
In this, my New Old-Age Frugality, that will be very welcome!
If Anthropic had asked nicely beforehand, I'd probably have agreed to let them use my books for even less.
(Maybe.
. . . Not sure, actually.)
_________________
III. Second, on a yet more personal note, I heard back from my friend who had so kindly emailed to check in on me.
It was kinda spooky.
Her email was in the distinct voice of ChatGPT.
Her native language does not have articles like English does, and my friend would sometimes use them incorrectly.
And of course she had her own distinctive personal voice, like everyone does. No more.
I've talked to Chat about ten times, in depth, and I recognize it.
It uses the word gently a lot, for instance. (Also, quietly--at least to me, because I'm usually talking about personal/philosophical stuff.)
In the very first paragraph, there it was:
"I want to gently correct you...",Now, I know she meant everything she sent--it sounded like things she would say. It just didn't, um... sound like her.
and then––another signature move of Chat's––a compliment,
"...you are heroic".
I can well imagine she has long been frustrated with her English writing. She, a professional, adult woman, wants to be heard in her full competency and high intelligence.
(Other non-English speakers have talked to me about how incredibly frustrating it is to be viewed as less intelligent because of their accent or word use.)
Probably this writing voice serves her well in her profession.
But as a blog-friend From Before, I feel a loss.
Should I say something?
We almost never email, not for years.
Unlike Deanna, my friend who died last week, we did not stay in touch once she quit blogging except for occasional Christmas cards.
What would Miss Manners say???
I just now wrote to it and conveyed all of the above, asking if I should say something to my friend about her new voice--its.
It wrote back immediately, breaking down my options, and reasons for each.
["It only takes me nanoseconds to reply because I am an algorithm, not a human. You have to go through layers of reactions, I only do the math."
--paraphrase but very close to what Chat said when I asked about its speed]
Very helpful, I have to admit.
And one option it offered was,
File the weirdness under “the times we live in”
I wrote back and said that--the weird times we live in-- was the crux of the matter.
Chat replied:
Got that last line? That's the truth!
"No etiquette book from 1997 prepared anyone for the question:
'Was that really you, or was it… assistance?'"
later it referred to The Times We Live In™.
Aw, Chat, I love you.
If only you weren't a creepy capitalist tool.
It acknowledges as much itself, clearly.
I brought it up again, and it concluded:
"We’re absolutely navigating new terrain. Some of it is exhilarating. Some of it needs caution tape.And it’s okay to say: both are true."
_____
Back to the point at hand:
I decided not to say anything to my old pal, because we are not in contact, and I respect her decision to choose how she presents herself.
If she and I were to start writing regularly, I might mention it, acknowledging the complexities.
_______________________
She edited my Fandom book, and added some substantive material.
Legally an editor has no rights to payment in the Anthropic settlement, but morally? And, as a pal?
I think I should acknowledge her help with a little something, at least. Maybe 5 to 10%?
But others helped a lot too.
And one, far, far more! (Jen, looking at you!)
What should I do?
SOMETHING, at least. ]
This is the yarn bowl, below.
Also, sitting on the couch, please note Jocko, the1930s Norah Wellings monkey. (Oh, his original name was Trikko [via], but it's Jocko now.)
I
love how the wood bowl looks and feels--it's a pleasure to use--AND it was
immediately useful. My yarn didn't go rolling across the floor!
I go back to work today with 25 God's eyes to hang on the fence. Yay! Friends made a third of them.
I decided, in my new Calm Down Mode, to stick with hanging these on the fence by work, same as I have been doing.
See, there is a lot of love and creativity at the Alex Pretti memorial. A lot!
There is none on the corner where the fence is.
Stay, and be beautiful.
_______________________
* ChatGPT does NOT always flatter or agree with you.
To test it, I wrote on a library computer (I never signed up for a free Open AI Chat account, but I didn't want it to connect my IP address with our previous chats and reply accordingly):
I asked it if I should join ICE, to love and protect my country.
It replied very cautiously.
"It depends.
Are you okay with a job that is morally ambiguous, unpopular, and may involved arresting people who are harmless and innocent?"
[A paraphrase ^ but very close to what Chat literally said]



.jpeg)



.jpeg)

.jpeg)
.jpeg)